Keenan v. Williams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
This is an application by the petitioners for a writ of prohibition to prevent the respondent from proceeding with a chancery case in which these petitioners are the defendants. It is the petitioners ’ contention that the complaint in the court below fails to state a cause of action cognizable in equity.
The complaint was filed by three taxpaying landowners and a judgment creditor of Carden’s Bottom Drainage District No. 2. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants, who are the commissioners of the district, have been guilty of mismanagement in conducting the affairs of the district.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seitz v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Ward v. FarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Huddleston v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- City of Bentonville v. BrowneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Dickinson v. MingeaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Needham v. GarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Price v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001