Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Nash

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 11, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blandeord, Justice.

[Dickerson, as administrator of Sarah Jennings, deceased, advertised certain land for sale, and a claim was interposed by Nash, as agent for Healan et al. The case was submitted to the presiding judge without a jury, and from his finding the following facts appear : Hastings Jennings died, leaving the land in dispute, of the value of $160.00, and personalty of the value of $124.00. The realty and personalty were set apart as a twelve months’ support to his widow and four minor children by a former wife. The widow consumed all the personalty. (The bill of exceptions states…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walden v. WaldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Williams v. RosetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Moore v. PittmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Grace v. RouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Bank of Cuthbert v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API