Haupt v. Ames
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
On motion for reargument. Denied.
1Opinion of the CourtWoodwaed, J.
This motion for a reargument seems to be made, not with any idea of success, but to' call the attention of the •court to what the defendant, Paul K. Ames, through his attorney, claims to be an injustice inflicted upon him by the former opinion of the court, reported in 26 App. Div. 550, 50 N. Y. Supp. 495, the opinion having been written by me. Upon re-examination of the case, I am entirely satisfied that it would have been better and more just had the decision been based upon the simple grounds plainly stated in Schaefer v. Lithographing Co. (Sup.) 51 N. Y. Supp. 104. I am convinced that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haupt v. AmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Schaefer v. Empire Lithographing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brophy v. HaeberleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- People ex rel. North American Co. v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Bowron v. de SeldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Olmstead v. RobertsNew York Supreme Court · 1910