Legal Opinion

Olmstead v. Roberts

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to recover the possession of real property.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Kirk, J.. This action was begun in April, 1897; it was brought on for trial in April, 1910. It is an action in ejectment. In the complaint- the plaintiff asks to recover all of lot 340 and 217 acres of lot 4, townships 10' and 2©' of Totten & Crossfield’s Purchase. ■ At the trial leave was given to the plaintiff to -amend, -setting up that he is the owner of an undivided one-half interest in lot 340- and' an undivided three-quarters interest in the -said 217 acres of lot 4. Hereafter said 217 acres will be spoken of for convenience as lot 4. On December 13, 18-94, the notice, under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ensign v. . BarseNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Ostrander v. . DarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. McDougall v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. People Ex Rel. Ostrander v. . ChapinNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howell v. RoweNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API