Legal Opinion

Central Trust Co. v. Bovey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1971No. 69-765PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

The point of decision in this appeal rests upon the interpretation of the language of the 1930 trust instrument providing that at the death of each daughter a one-fourth portion of the corpus was to be paid to the “child or children * * * surviving the daughter then dying. ’ ’

Appellant contends that, in the absence of an intent to the contrary, a settlor must be presumed to have intended to include an adopted child within a class gift to the “child or children” of the life beneficiary of the trust.

R. C. 3107.13, effective August 28, 1951 (124 Ohio Laws 178, 193), provides, in part:

“* * * Por…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Albright v. AlbrightOhio Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Billings v. FowlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Ohio Citizens Bank v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Conkle v. ConkleOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. BoveySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Durst v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API