Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Haft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 29, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the *951finding by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant lost his job because he had been making harassing telephone calls to his supervisor and that his actions constituted misconduct sufficient to warrant the denial of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PadillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. In re the Claim of MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. In re the Claim of MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. People ex rel. Bridges v. MalcolmNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. In re the Claim of LevickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zickafoose v. UB Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1998
  2. Matter of Moniz (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API