Legal Opinion

State v. Jupiter

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1986No. KA 4394PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIACCIO, Judge.

Defendant, Karl F. Jupiter, was charged with possession of cocaine. R.S. 40:967. The defendant entered a plea of not guilty. He filed a motion to suppress the evidence and this motion was denied. The defendant thereafter entered a “guilty plea”, pursuant to R.S. 40:983, and reserved his right to appeal the ruling of the trial court on the motion to suppress. See: State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La., 1976). The trial court accepted the plea, pursuant to R.S. 40:983, and explained to the defendant, at the sentencing, that as a first offender, no finding of guilt would be made and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. State v. RuthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Diaz-RubioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. State v. BretagnolleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. State v. BarconeyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. State v. JupiterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  5. State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Leger, Jr. AKA Wilbert LegerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API