State v. Jupiter
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CIACCIO, Judge.
Defendant, Karl F. Jupiter, was charged with possession of cocaine. R.S. 40:967. The defendant entered a plea of not guilty. He filed a motion to suppress the evidence and this motion was denied. The defendant thereafter entered a “guilty plea”, pursuant to R.S. 40:983, and reserved his right to appeal the ruling of the trial court on the motion to suppress. See: State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La., 1976). The trial court accepted the plea, pursuant to R.S. 40:983, and explained to the defendant, at the sentencing, that as a first offender, no finding of guilt would be made and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- State v. RuthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Diaz-RubioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- State v. BretagnolleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- State v. BarconeyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- State v. JupiterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Leger, Jr. AKA Wilbert LegerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018