Legal Opinion

Hall v. Lee

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1981No. 2295PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, Judge:

This is an appeal from the lower court’s order denying appellants’ motion for sanctions. Because the appeal is not properly before us, we are compelled to quash it.

The facts underlying this appeal may be summarized as follows. On December 8, 1978, appellants filed a complaint in trespass alleging that they had sustained injuries as a result of an automobile accident. On June 15, 1979, their counsel, Mr. Feingold, requested that defendants-appellees make available all documents subject to discovery under the rules of civil procedure. In response thereto, appellees forwarded…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Sullivan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Rutherford v. RutherfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. McManus v. Chubb Group of InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Christian v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. First Seneca Bank v. Greenville Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Swift v. MilnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API