State v. Deakyne
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Carey, J.:
The motion to dismiss is based upon the allegation that the averments contained in the petition do not disclose a prima facie case, and it is therefore in the nature of a demurrer requiring the Court to consider all allegations of the petition as true. More specifically, the respondent submits four reasons why the petition is insufficient: (1) The petition states insufficient facts to enable the respondent to answer; (2) Miller’s right to the office of Councilman and his acts as such can not be questioned collaterally in an action to which he is not a party; (3) The words “eligible…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erwin v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
- The People of N.C. Ex Rel . Norfleet v. . Staton, Jr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Heyward v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Palermo v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ajax Contractors, Inc. v. MyattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Board of Education of McCreary County v. NevelsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- In re Penny Hill Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1959
- Ekaterina Tchernavskiskh v. Peter "PJ" AccetturoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.