Legal Opinion

State v. Deakyne

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 23, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, J.:

The motion to dismiss is based upon the allegation that the averments contained in the petition do not disclose a prima facie case, and it is therefore in the nature of a demurrer requiring the Court to consider all allegations of the petition as true. More specifically, the respondent submits four reasons why the petition is insufficient: (1) The petition states insufficient facts to enable the respondent to answer; (2) Miller’s right to the office of Councilman and his acts as such can not be questioned collaterally in an action to which he is not a party; (3) The words “eligible…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erwin v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  2. The People of N.C. Ex Rel . Norfleet v. . Staton, Jr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Heyward v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Palermo v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ajax Contractors, Inc. v. MyattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Board of Education of McCreary County v. NevelsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  4. In re Penny Hill Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1959
  5. Ekaterina Tchernavskiskh v. Peter "PJ" AccetturoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API