United States v. Hicks
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
The accused was convicted by special court-martial of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. At trial, an accomplice testified against him under arrangements with the convening authority, which trial counsel described as a “promise of immunity,” and which, on review, the board of review held “equated to . . . immunity.” The board of review determined that these arrangements disqualified the convening authority from reviewing the conviction. United States v White, 10 USCMA 63, 27 CMR 137. However, it concluded that review by a…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. SpainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
- United States v. McElweeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
4Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. CansdaleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- McDonald v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- United States v. FletcherU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. RobbinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. WatsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1975