Legal Opinion

United States v. Hicks

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 22, 1968No. 21,465PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

The accused was convicted by special court-martial of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. At trial, an accomplice testified against him under arrangements with the convening authority, which trial counsel described as a “promise of immunity,” and which, on review, the board of review held “equated to . . . immunity.” The board of review determined that these arrangements disqualified the convening authority from reviewing the conviction. United States v White, 10 USCMA 63, 27 CMR 137. However, it concluded that review by a…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. SpainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  3. United States v. McElweeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. CansdaleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. McDonald v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. United States v. FletcherU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  4. United States v. RobbinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  5. United States v. WatsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API