Legal Opinion
Avedon Engineering, Inc. v. Seatex
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 1, 2000No. CIV. A. 94-B-2561PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
This contract case is before me on remand from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Avedon Eng’g, Inc. v. Seatex, 126 F.3d 1279 (10th Cir.1997). The parties have briefed the issues of whether future transaction and arbitration provisions in Defendant’s confirmation forms became part of the parties’ contract, and if so what statute of limitations applies. The issues are adequately briefed and oral argument would not materially aid their resolution. For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that the arbitration and future transaction provisions…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- In re the Arbitration between Marlene Industries Corp. & Carnac Textiles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- N&d Fashions, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation and Nelly Don, Inc., a Missouri Corporation v. Dhj Industries, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Avedon Engineering, Inc. v. SeatexCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Frank E. Dorton and J. A. Castle, Partners, D/B/A the Carpet Mart v. Collins & Aikman Corporation and Painter Carpet Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leica Geosystems, Inc. v. L.W.S. Leasing, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- SibcoImtrex, Inc. v. American Foods Group, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Dumont Telephone Co. v. Power & Telephone Supply Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
- BVS, Inc. v. CDW Direct, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
- Casella v. Solmax GeosyntheticsVermont Superior Court · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.