Legal Opinion

Depuy, Inc. v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 3, 2004No. 02 C 4023PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff DePuy, Inc. (“DePuy”) alleges that defendants Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc. (collectively, “Zimmer”) have infringed its patent No. 5,370,706 (the“ ’706 Patent”). The then pleaded claims and defenses of the parties and the court’s initial construction of the patent claims invoked are set forth in my published memorandum opinion and order, DePuy, Inc. v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc., 276 F.Supp.2d 910 (N.D.Ill.2003). On March 12, 2004, I entered a minute order granting DePuy’s motion for reconsideration of a portion of my prior…

2Cases cited32 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Stowe Woodward, L.L.C. v. Sensor Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2005