Legal Opinion

West Texas Utilities Co. v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 13, 1929No. 596PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.

The appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellee against appellant for the value of a mule. Briefly, the facts are: Appellant, through its employees, was constructing a telephone line along a highway near the farm upon which appellee resided. At the close of a day’s work the employees left two spools of wire near the traveled portion of the highway. One of these spools was left lying flat in a ditch, and the other was left standing on its end between the ditch and that portion of the highway over which vehicles passed. Appellee came along -this highway after working hours, taking some mules…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Seale. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BehneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Sherman, Shreveport & Southern Railway Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Scott v. ShineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cogdell v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Hodges v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Prater v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API