West Texas Utilities Co. v. Haynes
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.
The appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellee against appellant for the value of a mule. Briefly, the facts are: Appellant, through its employees, was constructing a telephone line along a highway near the farm upon which appellee resided. At the close of a day’s work the employees left two spools of wire near the traveled portion of the highway. One of these spools was left lying flat in a ditch, and the other was left standing on its end between the ditch and that portion of the highway over which vehicles passed. Appellee came along -this highway after working hours, taking some mules…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Seale. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
- San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BehneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Sherman, Shreveport & Southern Railway Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Scott v. ShineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cogdell v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Hodges v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Prater v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952