Legal Opinion
Grebow v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William J. Davis, J.
Motion sequence numbers 001 and 002 are consolidated for disposition. Under motion sequence number 001, the petitioner Bret A. Grebow moves for an order, inter alia, setting aside the sale of a certain motor vehicle by the New York City Marshal Jeffrey Rose (Marshal Rose or Rose) to one Harvey Weisman (Weisman) and to return it to his possession. The City of New York, New York City Department of Finance, New York City Department of Transportation, and the New York City Parking Violations Bureau (collectively the City), and Rose oppose the same. Weisman…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mihlovan v. GrozavuNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Four Seasons Hotels Ltd. v. VinnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Plant City Steel Corp. v. National MacHinery Exchange, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Eckstein v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adinolfi v. SolimineAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1998
- Seventh Regiment Armory Conservancy, Inc. v. Knickerbocker Greys, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, New York County2025