Legal Opinion
Breathe Dc v. Juul Labs, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 13, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2020-0619Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BREATHE DC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-619 (JEB) JUUL LABS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In January 2020, Plaintiff Breathe DC sued Defendant JUUL Labs, Inc. in District of Columbia Superior Court. Breathe DC alleged that Juul had violated the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act by advertising its electronic-cigarette cartridges in a misleading way. Asserting federal-question and diversity jurisdiction, Defendant removed the lawsuit to federal court. Plaintiff moved to remand. That Motion sat in limbo…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.