Richardson County v. Hull
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Richardson county. Tried below before Appelget, J. cited: Brown v. Otoe County, 6 Neb., Ill; State, ex rel. Clark, v. Buffalo County, 6 Id., 454; Dixon County v. Barnes, 13 Id., 294; McCann v. Sierra County, 7 Cal., 121; State, ex rel.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Richardson county. Tried below before Appelget, J. cited: Brown v. Otoe County, 6 Neb., Ill; State, ex rel. Clark, v. Buffalo County, 6 Id., 454; Dixon County v. Barnes, 13 Id., 294; McCann v. Sierra County, 7 Cal., 121; State, ex rel. Williams, v. Bonebrake, 4 Kan., 247; Jackson County v. La Crosse County, 13 Wis., 548; Com’rs v. Zeigelhofer, 38 Ohio St., 523; In re Inhabitants of Windham, 32 Me., 452; Fulton County v. Maxwell, 101 Inch, 268; White County Com’rs v. Karp, 90 Id., 236 ; Bryan v. Moore, 81 Id., 9; State v. Hamilton, 26 Ohio St., 364; Snelson v.…
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
Upon the filing of the opinion in this case (24 Neb., 536) a motion for a rehearing was filed on behalf of the defendant in error, and a rehearing having been granted, it has been resubmitted. The action was brought by Hull to recover of the county $509.43 which had been paid by him for taxes upon a tract of land not subject to taxes. There is but one question in the case and that is, whether the cause of action is of such a nature that it should first have *812been presented to tlie county board for allowance. Upon a careful review of the authorities by Judge Cobb in the former opinion, it was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nance v. Falls CityNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Richardson County v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Roberts v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Roberts v. Adams CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stenberg v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Chase County v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1899