Legal Opinion

Richardson County v. Hull

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to the district court for Richardson county. Tried below before Appelget, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

This action was commenced by the defendant in error in the district court of Eichardson county to recover of said county the sum of $509.43, which had been paid into the county treasury for taxes upon a certain tract of land not subject to assessment.

The petition alleges the wrongful listing upon the books of said county for taxation, and the levying of taxes thereon for the years 1871, 1872, and 1873, of the land in question ; that the same was sold to different parties for the taxes of 1871, 1872, and 1873, and finally was sold to one Charles Bruin, at the sale of December 2, 1875, for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stringham v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Brown v. CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Ruggles v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Nance v. Falls CityNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Board of Commissioners v. BarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Douglas County v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hollingsworth v. Saunders CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Mitchell v. County of ClayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Pennock v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Stenberg v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API