Legal Opinion
Macaulay v. Astrue
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided April 27, 2009No. 2:08-CV-32PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN M. CONROY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Christine A. Macaulay is a claimant for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). She brings this action against the Social Security Commissioner pursuant to 45 U.S.C. § 405(g) to reverse the Commissioner’s final decision that she is not disabled and is therefore not entitled to benefits. On September 8, 2008, Macaulay filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, and on January 7, 2009, the Commissioner filed a Motion for an Order Affirming the Decision of the Social Security…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Betty J. DODRILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norman v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Kelsey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Sleight v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012