Howard M. Schoor, Associates, Inc. v. Holmdel Heights Construction Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mountain, J.
Plaintiffs, two engineering and surveying firms with identical or very similar management and ownership, brought this action to recover amounts due for professional services rendered by them to defendant, Holmdel Heights Construction Company. The latter is in receivership and the suit has proceeded, in effect, solely against defendant, Alan Sugarman. Plaintiffs’ claim is that Sugarman, an attorney at law of this state, personally undertook to pay for the services rendered. He defends on the factual ground that he made no promise to do so…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
3Cited by12 opinions
- Otto Contracting Co. v. S. Schinella & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Graybar Electric Co. v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Herman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
- Bolle v. COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITALNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Walder, Sondak, Berkeley & Brogan v. LipariNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.