Legal Opinion

City of Mitchell v. Dakota Central Telephone Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Cóurt, Davison County. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Action by the City of Mitchell and others against 'the Dakota Central Telephone Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

This cause was tried to the trial court without a jury and upon an agreed statement of facts. Said court made findings of facts in accordance with said agreed statement, entered conclusions of law thereon, and rendered a judgment in favor of the defendant. An appeal was taken to this court and the opinion of this court upon such appeal will be found in 25 S. D. 409, 127 N. W. 582. ” By such opinion the trial court was directed to amend its conclusions of law in accordance with the views of this court, and to “enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the amount found due and unpaid to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Mitchell v. Dakota Central Telephone Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Seiberling v. MortinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Brewster v. MengNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Esler v. Wabash RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Durr v. HardestySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Janssen v. TushaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. City of Mitchell v. Dakota Central Telephone Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API