Legal Opinion

Hedrick v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 8, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The transcript of evidence was filed in vacation. There is no order in the record showing its filing, or properly making it a part of the record. The motion to strike it from the record must be sustained. Maynard v. Commonwealth, 210 Ky. 362, 275 S. W. 871; Ford v. Commonwealth, 223 Ky. 677, 4 S. W. (2d) 683; Jones v. Commonwealth, 225 Ky. 273, 8 S. W. (2d) 382.

The appeal is denied, and the judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maynard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Ford v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hiles v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930