Legal Opinion
Hedrick v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided November 8, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The transcript of evidence was filed in vacation. There is no order in the record showing its filing, or properly making it a part of the record. The motion to strike it from the record must be sustained. Maynard v. Commonwealth, 210 Ky. 362, 275 S. W. 871; Ford v. Commonwealth, 223 Ky. 677, 4 S. W. (2d) 683; Jones v. Commonwealth, 225 Ky. 273, 8 S. W. (2d) 382.
The appeal is denied, and the judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maynard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Ford v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hiles v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930