Legal Opinion

Ford v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 20, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Commissioner Hobson

Affirming.

William Ford was indicted in the Carroll circuit ■court for unlawfully having in possession spirituous and intoxicating liquors, and it was charged in the indictment that he had been theretofore convicted of a like offense.^ On a trial of the case he was found guilty, and his punishment was fixed at one year in the penitentiary. He appeals.

The Attorney General has entered a motion to strike ■out the bill of exceptions, for the reason that there is no ■order of court filing it. A bill of exceptions is not a part of the record, unless it is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Abraham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Hedrick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Hiles v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Hurd v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API