Ford v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Commissioner Hobson
Affirming.
William Ford was indicted in the Carroll circuit ■court for unlawfully having in possession spirituous and intoxicating liquors, and it was charged in the indictment that he had been theretofore convicted of a like offense.^ On a trial of the case he was found guilty, and his punishment was fixed at one year in the penitentiary. He appeals.
The Attorney General has entered a motion to strike ■out the bill of exceptions, for the reason that there is no ■order of court filing it. A bill of exceptions is not a part of the record, unless it is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Abraham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Hedrick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Hiles v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Hurd v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929