Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2001No. Nos. 99-3891, 99-468Published

1Per curiam

The United States appeals the district court’s decision to sentence James and Mark Anderson under the guideline for structuring financial transactions to evade reporting requirements, Section 2S1.3, instead of the guideline for money laundering, Section 2S1.1. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the district court.

I

James Anderson and his son Mark owned and operated Central Trux & Parts, a truck salvage yard in Toledo, Ohio. Their business was relatively small before its demise and James and his sons performed the bulk of the physical labor there. Two other employees,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. Ronald Earl ClayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. GamezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API