Legal Opinion

Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 19, 2008No. C043118CV; A135686PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp., 220 Or App 671, 188 P3d 359 (2008), we modified on reconsideration, but adhered to, our earlier opinion in Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp., 217 Or App 412, 177 P3d 1 (2008). Springville Corporation now petitions for reconsideration of the modified opinion, noting that a parenthetical statement in the opening paragraph could be seen as inconsistent with the actual outcome of the case as reflected in the last sentence of the opinion: “Springville’s negligence claim was not conclusively resolved until entry of the general judgment.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shelter Products, Inc. v. Steelwood Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Levasseur v. ArmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville CorporationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. LEVASSEUR v. ArmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API