Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1959No. Appeal, 26PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The defendant was convicted of burglary. He had demurred to the evidence, and after verdict he filed a motion in arrest of judgment. The motion was denied by the court en banc and the defendant was sentenced. In this appeal he contends that the evidence against him was insufficient to sustain his conviction of the crime. Although the testimony was wholly circumstantial, the judgment of sentence must be affirmed.

A small grocery operated by one Frank Zearfoss at Mountaintop in Luzerne County was entered on the night of Friday, October 4, or early Saturday, October 5, 1957,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. LibonatiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. NasutiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Commonwealth v. MarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Commonwealth v. SaudersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RumseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. GrayPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. Spesak, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API