Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2004No. E2003-00691-SC-R11-PCPublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Janice M. Holder, J.,

delivered the

opinion of the court,

in which Frank F. Drowota, III, C.J., and E. Riley Anderson, Adolpho A. Birch, Jr., and William M. Barker, JJ., joined.

We granted permission to appeal to determine whether the petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief states a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We hold that the petition does state a colorable claim. Therefore, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded to the post-conviction court for the appointment of counsel.

Factual and Procedural Background

Connie…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Fields v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Burnett v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. James D. WoodenTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. ANTHONY WHITED v. STATE OF TENNESSEECourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  3. Andre Benson v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  4. Antonio Bonds v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
  5. Antonio Hoyle v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2007

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API