Arnold v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Janice M. Holder, J.,
delivered the
opinion of the court,
in which Frank F. Drowota, III, C.J., and E. Riley Anderson, Adolpho A. Birch, Jr., and William M. Barker, JJ., joined.
We granted permission to appeal to determine whether the petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief states a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We hold that the petition does state a colorable claim. Therefore, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded to the post-conviction court for the appointment of counsel.
Factual and Procedural Background
Connie…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fields v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Burnett v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by114 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. James D. WoodenTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- ANTHONY WHITED v. STATE OF TENNESSEECourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
- Andre Benson v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
- Antonio Bonds v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
- Antonio Hoyle v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.