Legal Opinion

State of Tennessee v. James D. Wooden

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2015No. E2014-01069-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 307 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · ClarkCornelia A. Clark, J.

Bivins and Holly Kirby, JJ., joined.

We granted this appeal to determine whether a party filing a motion under Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1 (“Rule 36.1”) states a colorable claim for relief for correction of an illegal sentence by alleging that the trial court increased his sentence above the statutory presumptive minimum sentence but failed to find enhancement factors justifying the increase. Answering this question requires us to determine the meaning of two terms used in Rule 36.1 — “colorable claim” and “illegal sentence.” We hold that the definition of “colorable…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Summers v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Stephenson v. CarltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State of Tennessee v. Adrian R. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. BurkhartTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by307 opinions

  1. First Community Bank, N.A. v. First Tennessee Bank, N.A.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State of Tennessee v. Ray RowlandTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Charles L. Jones, III v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
  4. Charles Owens v. Kevin Genovese, WardenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  5. Christopher D. Hodge v. Debra Johnson, WardenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017

302 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API