Legal Opinion

Brabham v. City of Sumter

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 13, 1981No. 21372PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Chief Justice:

The plaintiff initiated this action seeking money damages for a change in zoning classification of his property, which he alleges resulted in a taking of his property for public use without just compensation. The trial judge sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

Essentially, the appellant’s complaint alleges that he advised the defendant on numerous occasions that he would experience irreparable harm, if a new zoning ordinance were adopted. Despite his requests, a new zoning ordinance was passed and his subsequent efforts for change have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gasque v. Town of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  2. Henderson v. City of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. Mailman Development Corp. v. City of HollywoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Mailman Development Corp. v. City of HollywoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Stoddard v. Western Carolina Regional Sewer AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. L. Boyd Stoddard, Barry T. Terry and Sara M. McDonald v. Western Carolina Regional Sewer Authority, L. Boyd Stoddard, Barry T. Terry and Sara M. McDonald v. Western Carolina Regional Sewer AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Lake Frances Properties v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API