Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Ross

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1913No. 8,692PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Cass Circuit Court; John 8. Lairy, Judge. Action by George E. Ross against Claude C. Bisbop, as administrator of the estate of George R. Hoopes, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

This action arose on a claim filed by appellee George E. Ross against the estate of appellant’s decedent for legal services rendered Harry G. Reed, executor, and Florence W. Hoopes, executrix, named in decedent’s will. A demurrer to appellee’s claim was overruled, and appellant then filed a special answer averring substantially the following facts: Appellant’s decedent, George R. Hoopes, died a nonresident of Indiana, but left assets and creditors in this State, also a will which was admitted to probate in Chester County, Pennsylvania, decedent’s domicile, upon which letters testamentary were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Howard v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Braithwaite v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. HellerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. McCord v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boes v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Dolan v. AnthonySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API