Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 2, 1935No. 42716PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

The plaintiff in her petition specifies twenty-one grounds of negligence against the defendant. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, the defendant filed a motion to strike from the petition of the plaintiff certain specifications of negligence which will be later, partially, at least, set out. This kind of motion is unknown to the practice in Iowa; the usual course being, under the circumstances, to ask the court to withdraw issues from the jury on which there is no evidence or which fail to state a legal ground of negligence, and this course should be followed. However, as no objection was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kisling v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Wheelan v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Kadlec v. Al. Johnson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. O'Rourke v. McConaughey.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Hanson v. ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Graber v. City of AnkenySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Ehrhardt v. Ruan Transport Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  5. Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. Glen Downing and Independent Truckers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API