Town of Leeds v. Cason
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The suit is in assumpsit, by a municipal corporation, to recover tbe cost of installing a sanitary toilet on private property, upon failure of the owner so to do, as provided by ordinance enacted pursuant to Code, § 2051.
Tbe sole question presented is whether an action of assumpsit may be maintained; tbe city having failed to comply with tbe provisions of tbe statute necessary to the enforcement of a lien on tbe property.
Tbe statute provides that in such case tbe city may install tbe closet “at the expense of tbe owner, tbe cost thereof tó be a lien upon tbe property in favor of tbe city or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Greil Bros. v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Alabama Traction Co. v. Selma Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schmidt v. Village of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- St. Clair County Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Pell CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- City of Leeds v. AvramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943