Legal Opinion

Town of Leeds v. Cason

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1928No. 6 Div. 103PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is in assumpsit, by a municipal corporation, to recover tbe cost of installing a sanitary toilet on private property, upon failure of the owner so to do, as provided by ordinance enacted pursuant to Code, § 2051.

Tbe sole question presented is whether an action of assumpsit may be maintained; tbe city having failed to comply with tbe provisions of tbe statute necessary to the enforcement of a lien on tbe property.

Tbe statute provides that in such case tbe city may install tbe closet “at the expense of tbe owner, tbe cost thereof tó be a lien upon tbe property in favor of tbe city or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greil Bros. v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Alabama Traction Co. v. Selma Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Village of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. St. Clair County Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Pell CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. City of Leeds v. AvramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API