Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Lonsdale

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1925No. 14736PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This action was instituted by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, for the recovery of real estate.

The ease was tried to the court without the intervention of the jury, by consent of parties, and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant has appealed, and assigns as error: First, that the trial court erred in its findings of faot and conclusions of law that the lots conveyed to plaintiff in error by her grantors were only 140 feet in depth; second, the trial court erred in its findings of fact and conclusions of law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crawford v. ShintafferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Holbert v. PatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Atkins v. LynholmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Miller v. BrownfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Wagner v. EarpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Whelchel v. WhelchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. State v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API