Nichols v. Lonsdale
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
This action was instituted by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, for the recovery of real estate.
The ease was tried to the court without the intervention of the jury, by consent of parties, and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant has appealed, and assigns as error: First, that the trial court erred in its findings of faot and conclusions of law that the lots conveyed to plaintiff in error by her grantors were only 140 feet in depth; second, the trial court erred in its findings of fact and conclusions of law…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crawford v. ShintafferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Holbert v. PatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Atkins v. LynholmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Miller v. BrownfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Wagner v. EarpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Whelchel v. WhelchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- State v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.