Legal Opinion
In re Digerati Technologies, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 12, 2015No. 13-33264-H4-11PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING FINAL FEE APPLICATION OF DEBTOR’S INVESTMENT BANKER GILBERT A. HERRERA AND HERRERA PARTNERS FOR ALLOWANCE OF COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING JULY 1, 2013 THROUGH APRIL 4, 2014
[Doc. No. 826]
JEFF BOHM, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
This Memorandum Opinion concerns a subject that is near and dear to the heart of any professional who provides services to a bankruptcy estate: compensation. In this particular case, the message is that what a professional tells the Court — or fails to tell the Court — -in connection with the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Andrews & Kurth L.L.P. v. Family Snacks, Inc. (In Re Pro-Snax Distributors, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- In the Matter of Taxman Clothing Company, Debtor. Appeal of Arthur Winer, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- In the Matter of Daisy M. Prudhomme and John and Kathleen Batten, Debtors. John F. Arens v. Al Boughton, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Digerati Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015