Legal Opinion

Whipple v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 2, 1992No. 76475PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review State v. Whipple, 592 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), in which the Third District Court of Appeal certified the following question as one of great public importance:

SHOULD POPE V. STATE [561 So.2d 554] BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY TO SENTENCES IMPOSED PRIOR TO APRIL 26, 1990?

We accept jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. In Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992), we answered this question in the affirmative.

In the instant case, the district court correctly applied Pope retroactively by finding that even though the judge orally…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. State v. WhippleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pease v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. State v. KopkoSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Valrio v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API