Spitz v. Maxwell
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
Defendant seeks to dismiss the action for legal insufficiency and insists that no cause of action is pleaded and because of the admitted facts the causes are prohibited by article 2-A (§§ 61-a-61-i) of the Civil Practice Act which refers to actions against public policy. Ill the first cause plaintiff complains that he delivered various articles of jewelry to the defendant after their engagement and in contemplation of their marriage ; that thereafter the parties mutually agreed to cancel and abandon their contract of marriage; that, therefore, the condition upon which the jewelry was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Andie v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Andie v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Beck v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Wilson v. RiggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Wilson v. RiggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Easley v. NealNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Nosonowitz v. KahnCity of New York Municipal Court · 1951