Hacker v. Kyle
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed April 11, 1933 :
Fairchild, J.
As stated by respondent, the nature of the action is on contract under which the appellant, holding an option on the respondent’s stock in a corporation, and which option he was about to exercise, agreed that the respondent might comply therewith and make a sale without waiver of a claim of fraud, a question as to which had arisen in her mind, and that in the event her claim of fraud was established he would pay her a sum of money to be determined in the manner set out in the contract, referred to in the statement of facts. On March…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Milwaukee Brick & Cement Co. v. SchoknechtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- McDermott v. O'Neil Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- James Music Co. v. BridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Steven v. Hale-Haas Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- Sammond v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Jensen v. Republic Steel Corp.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1940