Legal Opinion

Hacker v. Kyle

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 11, 1933 :

Fairchild, J.

As stated by respondent, the nature of the action is on contract under which the appellant, holding an option on the respondent’s stock in a corporation, and which option he was about to exercise, agreed that the respondent might comply therewith and make a sale without waiver of a claim of fraud, a question as to which had arisen in her mind, and that in the event her claim of fraud was established he would pay her a sum of money to be determined in the manner set out in the contract, referred to in the statement of facts. On March…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Brick & Cement Co. v. SchoknechtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. McDermott v. O'Neil Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. James Music Co. v. BridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Steven v. Hale-Haas Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Sammond v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Jensen v. Republic Steel Corp.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API