Legal Opinion

Sargent Cauefield and Jim Lucas v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1967No. 23412PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge:

These cases, consolidated for trial, were brought by Sargent Cauefield and Jim Lucas to recover damages for the alleged desecration of a Louisiana cemetery in which relatives of theirs are buried. The district court granted a motion by defendants to dismiss on the theory that the suit was foreclosed by the doctrine of judicial estoppel, as applied in Louisiana, due to a previous state court judgment which denied a similar claim made with respect to the same cemetery. We affirm.

The background details of this controversy and the legal principles involved were set forth…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. MarionneauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  2. California Company v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Humphreys v. Bennett Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  4. Ross v. GerungSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Muntz v. Algiers & G. St. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lloyd T. Griffin v. Robert F. Burns, Etc., Thomas A. McCormickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  3. Barnett v. DevelleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  4. Benson and Ford, Inc., D/B/A Ford Gas Co. v. Wanda Petroleum Co., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. James S. Gerrard v. William G. Larsen, Special Administrator of the Estate of Jack K. Gibbens, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API