Legal Opinion

Muntz v. Algiers & G. St. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1906No. 15,858PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Thomas C. W. Ellis, Judge. Action by George Muntz against the Algiers & Gretna Street Railway Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

NICHOLLS, J.

This case, under differing situations, has been before us three times; first appearing as Muntz v. A. & G. Ry. Co. et al., reported in 111 La. 423, 35 South. 624, 64 L. R. A. 222, 100 Am. St. Rep. 495, next as Muntz v. The Algiers & Gretna Ry. Co., 114 La. 437, 38 South. 410, and lastly as Muntz v. Jefferson Ry. Co. et al., 114 La. 860, 38 South. 586.

In the first suit the plaintiff sued the Algiers & Gretna Railway Company andi the Jefferson Railway Company in solido' in the civil district court for the parish of Orleans, seeking to recover the sum of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Castle v. . NoyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Emery v. FowlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
  3. Anderson v. West Chicago Street RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Muntz v. Algiers & G. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  5. Williams v. McGradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Coca Cola Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
  2. Barnett v. DevelleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. Williams v. MarionneauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  4. Portland Gold Mining Co. v. Stratton's Independence, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  5. Giedrewicz v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API