Legal Opinion
Application of Games Slayter
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 30, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6516PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office sustaining the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 1 to 4, inclusive, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 32, 33, and 34 of appellant’s application for a patent on polyphase materials. Claims 1, 4, and 34 are representative and read:
“1. A composite structure consisting of a heterogeneous system formed of a metallic phase uniformly dispersed in fibrous form throughout a continuous phase of a fused ceramic which differs from the fibrous phase in modulus of elasticity.
“4. A composite structure…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Peters v. Active Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Faries Mfg. Co. v. S. W. Farber Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roger W. Brown, ph.d. v. 3m, and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Revlon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- In Re Jacques Gosteli, Ivan Ernest and Robert B. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Sperry Rand Corporation, in 13,678 v. Knapp-Monarch Company, in 13,679Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Perricone v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.