Legal Opinion

Vann v. Harden

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 26, 1948No. Record No. 3326PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

Two actions at law by notice of motion were instituted in the trial court in November, 1945,—one in behalf of Arthur Gardner Harden, an infant seventeen years of age, suing by his father, Ernest R. Harden, Jr., as his next friend, and the other in behalf of the father, Ernest R. Harden, Jr.. In both, Dr. Foy Vann, an orthopedic surgeon was the defendant, and both actions were grounded upon the alleged negligence of Dr. Vann in the treatment of Arthur Gardner Harden. In the latter’s case the damages claimed were $25,000, and in the father’s case the damages claimed for deprivation of his son’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fox v. MasonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  2. Reed v. ChurchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  3. United Dentists, Inc. v. BryanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  4. Rann v. TwitchellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Fuste v. Riverside Healthcare Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  3. Cruz Rodríguez v. Corporación de Servicios del Centro MédicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1983
  4. Lyons v. GretherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  5. Neeley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API