Legal Opinion

Yancey v. City of Searcy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 21, 1948No. 4-8631PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

Searcy is a city of tlie second class; and this is a suit brought by a citizen and taxpayer against the city and its officials to test the legality of certain purchases and plans contemplated by the city. The appellant, as plaintiff below, claimed that the city proposed to act ultra vires; the appellees (defendants below) in their answer detailed exactly how and why <the city was about to proceed. The appellant’s demurrer to the answer was overruled. Thereupon the appellant refused to plead further; and the chancery court dismissed the complaint for i^ant of equity.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cumnock v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  2. McGehee v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Arkansas Utilities Co. v. City of ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. North Little Rock Water Co. v. Water Works CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. Mathers v. Moss, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. City of Little Rock v. RainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. City of Blytheville v. ParksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. City of Piggott v. EblenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Town of Dyess v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API