Legal Opinion

Holman v. Ward

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1926No. 843-4558PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.

On August 2, 1909, G. P. Holman was duly appointed guardian of the estate of the Ward minors, and duly qualified as such by taking the prescribed oath and giving bond with Humphries and Conway as sureties. Soon after he was appointed guardian, Holman received the sum of $817.-25 ip money belonging to the estate of said minors. On January 24, 1919, the probate court entered an order removing Holman from his office as guardian and directing him to file a report showing the condition of said estate, and at the same time E. H. Ward, one of said minors, who had become of age, was appointed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ablowich v. Greenville Natl. Bank.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Baker v. SmelserTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Heidenheimer & Co. v. L. A. & EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Bopp v. HansfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Gray v. McFarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bohlssen v. BohlssenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. American Surety Co. of New York v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Williamson v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Bohlssen v. BohlssenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Clark v. El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API