Legal Opinion
Office of the District of Columbia Controller v. Frost
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 14, 1994No. 92-CV-192, 92-CV-223PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
The Office of the District of Columbia Controller (“the employer”) appeals an order (No. 92-CV-192) of the Superior Court reversing the decision of the Office of Employee Appeals (“OEA”) that affirmed the termination of employment of appellee, Alvin C. Frost (“the employee”). We conclude that the Superior Court did not err in so ruling and accordingly we affirm 1 that part of the trial court’s order reversing the decision terminating employment. We reverse, however, the trial court’s remand order directing OEA to consider the employer’s claim that the sanction imposed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kegley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Gunty v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Milo D. Burroughs v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Stokes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Baumgartner v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Charles Bridges v. Sharon Pratt KellyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Raphael v. OkyiriDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Gilmore v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- District of Columbia v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.