Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Bronson Partners, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 19, 2011No. 10-878PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge:

In 2003 and 2004, Bronson Partners, LLC, Martin Howard, H & H Marketing, and Sandra Howard (collectively, “Bronson”) advertised and sold two purportedly miraculous weight loss products. According to advertisements, Bronson’s Chinese Diet Tea “SHEDS POUND AFTER POUND OF FAT — FAST!” Among other claims, Bronson’s advertisements also proclaimed that the Chinese Diet Tea “[e]liminates an amazing 91% of absorbed sugars,” “[prevents 83% of fat absorption,” and “[d]oubles your metabolic rate to burn calories fast.” Over the same time period, Bronson advertised its…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Mhany Management, Inc. v. County of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Connie Edmonson v. Lincoln National Life InsurancCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Fed. Trade Comm'n v. MosesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. ContorinisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API