Legal Opinion

Yarborough v. Yarborough

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1975No. 7512DC382PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

We find at the outset that plaintiff is not estopped to bring the present action by anything she has done. “Estoppel by misrepresentation, or equitable estoppel . . . grows out of such conduct of a party as absolutely precludes him, both at law and in equity, from asserting rights which might perhaps have otherwise existed ... as against another person who in good faith relied upon such conduct, and has been led thereby to change his position for the worse . . . . ” Boddie v. Bond, 154 N.C. 359, 365, 70 S.E. 824, 826 (1911). “[A] party who, with knowledge of the facts, accepts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Ballard Ex Rel. Smith v. HunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. White v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Boddie v. . BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. DeMayo v. Stone By Lynch, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. Ratton v. RattonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Smith v. SunTrust Bank (In re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
  5. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API