White v. Moore
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
The questions raised by this appeal are: (1) Is the proviso prohibiting a trailer park and automobile junk yard inserted in the commissioner’s deed to Kinlaw valid? (2) Are defendants estopped to deny the validity of the proviso? We answer both questions in the negative.(1) In Peal v. Martin, 207 N.C. 106, 176 S.E. 282 (1934), the court said: “A commissioner appointed by a court of equity to sell lands is empowered to do one specific act, viz., to sell the land and distribute the proceeds to the parties entitled thereto. He has no authority and can exercise no powers except such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Peal v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Southern Real Estate Loan & Trust Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Wayne Finance Corp. v. ShivarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Yarborough v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Gladden v. Pargas, Inc. of WaldorfCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Garland D. Gladden v. Pargas, Inc. Of Waldorf, Maryland and Pargas, Inc. Of Wilmington, North Carolina v. The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. East Ridge AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2003