Legal Opinion

Huff v. Ceremicos, Inc., Unpublished Decision (6-3-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2002No. Case No. 2001-CA-00359Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff Kenneth Huff appeals a summary judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County, Ohio, entered in favor of Ceremicos, Inc. on appellant's complaint alleging, inter alia, age discrimination. Appellant assigns two errors to the trial court:

ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR

{¶ 2} I. SINCE DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES FAILED TO SUSTAIN THEIR INITIAL BURDEN UNDER CIVIL RULE 56, SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DENIED.

{¶ 3} II. SUMMARY JUDGMENT WAS ERRONEOUSLY GRANTED AS PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT RIGHTFULLY COULD PROSECUTE A CLAIM FOR ALLEGED AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT.

{¶ 4} Appellant states…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reese v. Ohio State University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Oker v. Ameritech Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Talbott v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue ShieldDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
  4. Baker v. Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
  5. Oker v. Ameritech Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API