Legal Opinion

United States v. Santiago

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 30, 1988No. ACMR 8800904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIUNTINI, Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial consisting of officer and enlisted personnel. Pursuant to his plea, he was found guilty of one specification of bribery in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982). He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El. The convening authority approved the sentence. Appellant alleges the convening authority erred by approving a sentence including total forfeitures when confinement was not adjudged.

Appellant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WarnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. HicksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. NelsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DeisherU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. MarshU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API