Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brunk

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Summit County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Helm

The complaint in this case averred, among other things, that on the 12th day of March, 1884, Brunk made and executed to one Gorton his promissory note for $2,500, payable in two years, with interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum; that at the same time Brunk *76also executed to Gorton a title-bond, agreeing to convey, upon payment of $12,000, an undivided one-half interest in certain mining claims, which were carefully described; that as a part of the same transaction a special agreement was entered into between Brunk and Gorton, to the effect that the latter should have a mortgage…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wiswall v. GirouxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  2. Lowell Bros. v. WikstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. Livings v. TyoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Moore v. Denver Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API