Legal Opinion

Wiswall v. Giroux

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 4, 1921No. 9741PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action on promissory note and renewal agreement. Judgment for defendants. Error to the District Court of Boulder County, Hon. Neil F. Graham, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Plaintiff, Alexander Wiswall, brought suit to recover judgment upon a certain promissory note. At the close of the testimony >the court directed a verdict for the defendants. Plaintiff assigns error and brings the case here for review. The parties are designated as in the trial court.

The note was made, executed and delivered on March 20, 1909, by George H. Collins and Abbie E. Collins, payable three years after date and secured by trust deed on certain real property in Boulder County. In January, 1910, George H. Collins conveyed such real property by warranty deed to defendants J. P. Giroux…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stillman v. . NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Everson v. . GereNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Tidioute Savings Bank v. LibbeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Claflin v. . OstromNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Credit Men's Adjustment Co. v. VickerySupreme Court of Colorado · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Swofford v. Colorado National Bank of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Wood v. WilleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Lowell Bros. v. WikstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  5. Strange v. MaloneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API